You’ve Got Mail

Posted by Jessica 5 comments


Description
Neigborhood bookstore rivals unwittingly become e-mail pen pals in this charming remake of The Shop Around the CornerAmazon.com essential video
By now, Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan have amassed such a fund of goodwill with moviegoers that any new onscreen pairing brings nearly reflexive smiles. In You’ve Got Mail, the quintessential boy and girl next door repeat the tentative romantic crescendo that made Sleepless in Seattle, writer-director Nora Ephron’s previous excursion with the duo, a massive hit. The prospective couple do actually meet face to face early on, but Mail otherwise repeats the earlier feature’s gentle, extended tease of saving its romantic resolution until the final, gauzy shot.

The underlying narrative is an even more old-fashioned romantic pas de deux that is casually hooked to a newfangled device. The script, cowritten by the director and her sister, Delia Ephron, updates and relocates the Ernst Lubitsch classic, The Shop Around the Corner, to contemporary Manhattan, where Joe Fox (Hanks) is a cheerfully rapacious merchant whose chain of book superstores is gobbling up smaller, more specialized shops such as the children’s bookstore owned by Kathleen Kelly (Ryan). Their lives run in close parallel in the same idealized neighborhood, yet they first meet anonymously, online, where they gradually nurture a warm, even intimate correspondence. As they begin to wonder whether this e-mail flirtation might lead them to be soul mates, however, they meet and clash over their colliding business fortunes.

It’s no small testament to the two stars that we wind up liking and caring about them despite the inevitable (and highly manipulative) arc of the plot. Although their chemistry transcended the consciously improbable romantic premise of Sleepless, enabling director Ephron to attain a kind of amorous soufflé, this time around there’s a slow leak that considerably deflates the affair. Less credulous viewers will challenge Joe’s logic in prolonging the concealment of his online identity from Kathleen, and may shake their heads at Ephron’s reinvention of Manhattan as a spotless, sun-dappled wonderland where everybody lives in million-dollar apartments and color coordinates their wardrobes for cocktail parties. –Sam Sutherland
You’ve Got Mail

  • Share/Bookmark
5 Comments
Jan 29, 2010
11:47 am
#1 Anonymous :

My wife and I loved “Sleepless In Seattle”. We were never able to see “You’ve Got Mail” in the theater, so we just bought the DVD based on the cast and their director. We are sorry we did.

Where “Sleepless” was energetic, fresh and witty, “Mail” was contrived and, frankly, boring. The many plot parallels between “Sleepless” and “Mail” were also disconcerting, which made it difficult to treat this film as a standalone effort. My wife, who has watched “Ever After” about 10 times this week, and a movie I also think was excellent, is certainly a fan of the romantic genre. She was very dissapointed in this film.

I’m surprised I’m saying this about Tom Hanks, but even he was a bit lifeless and sedate in this movie. His character was hardly warm and likeable and rarely his animated, humorous self. Although he found some redemption toward the end, and there were slight moments where his physical comedy and mannerisms shined, there was little if any chemistry between him and Meg Ryan during their scenes. I think all the reviews praising their chemistry in “Mail” must be seeing something that really isn’t there. Consider that, in “Sleepless”, Ryan and Hanks were together for about 2 minutes in the entire film. Now that they actually have sustained conversations together in “Mail”, it became clear that it takes more than a romantic, somewhat clever back story to bring two people together in a convincing manner. The characters in “Sleepless” had much deeper development, and you really cared for Tom, his child, and the loss of his wife. Ryan’s curse of a fussy husband-to-be was also cause for concern about her plight, and how she was touched by Hanks’ situation via radio. In “Mail”, you have no sense of Hanks’ or Ryan’s character except through their emails, which despite their emotional intimacy, failed to sell you on what motivated these people. I simply did not care about either Hanks or Ryan that much. In “Sleepless”, you wanted them to win each other’s hearts. In “Mail”, you wanted them to just lighten up a bit and be more accessible.

The supporting cast was literally dead on arrival. Jean Stapleton gave the most contribution, but Ryan’s other lethargic friends and Greg Kinnear’s poorly scripted and directed characterization of someone against technology, were throwaway, uninteresting roles. When Greg brought out the typewriter, I was almost nauseous. What a typical way to reflect someone’s fight against technology. It was unfunny and unimaginative.

Basically, there was so much potential for this film, but its legacy of “Sleepless” and the many parallels with that film made “Mail” seem innocuous and slight in comparison. The lack of energy, poor character development, and the feeble romantic connection between Ryan and Hanks dropped this DVD to the bottom of our collection
Rating: 1 / 5

Jan 29, 2010
1:40 pm
#2 Jason Ray :

just another boring hollywood movie trying to cash in on the internet explosion
Rating: 1 / 5

Jan 29, 2010
4:10 pm
#3 M. Edwards :

Nora Ephron should be tied to a fencepost and beaten unconscious for making this drek. Look beyond the fact that this movie is one long commercial, no other film has more product placement. The insidious message of the film is the inevitability of corporate domination. Meg Ryan, the small business owner, has her bookstore driven into the ground by Tom Hanks and his Borders type mega-store but all is forgiven in the name of love. I’ve never known destroying someone’s livelihood to be an aphrodisiac. The rest is by the numbers romantic comedy. One star is beyond generous. Trite, shallow, saccharine, completely without merit. Everyone involved should be shot!
Rating: 1 / 5

Jan 29, 2010
6:28 pm
#4 Anonymous :

You’ve got a weak story, weak characters, and a very weak ending (I mean come on – she actually falls for this guy?). For those who have never seen this movie and are considering purchasing the video – please think twice. Read some of the other reviews down below to get an overall picture. If you are into sappiness without a consistent story, it may be for you.
Rating: 1 / 5

Jan 29, 2010
6:57 pm

Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks need to play in better movies cause this one was boring all it has is romance. I really don’t care about having mail.
Rating: 1 / 5

Sorry, comments are closed.

Previous Post
«
Next Post
»