The Count of Monte Cristo

Posted by Jessica 5 comments


Description
Jim Caviezel (HIGH CRIMES) and Guy Pearce (THE TIME MACHINE) give sizzling performances in THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO — the greatest tale of betrayal, adventure, and revenge the world has ever known. When the dashing and guileless Edmond Dantes (Caviezel) is betrayed by his best friend (Pearce) and wrongly imprisoned, he becomes consumed by thoughts of vengeance. After a miraculous escape, he transforms himself into the mysterious and wealthy Count of Monte Cristo, insinuates himself into the French nobility, and puts his cunning plan of revenge in action. This swashbuckling thriller will have you sitting on the edge of your seat until the last ounce of revenge is exacted.Amazon.com
Revenge rarely gets sweeter than it does in The Count of Monte Cristo, a rousing, impeccably crafted adaptation of Alexandre Dumas père’s literary classic. Filmed countless times before, the story is revitalized by director Kevin Reynolds (rallying after Waterworld) and screenwriter Jay Wolpert, who wisely avoid the action-movie anachronisms that plagued 2001’s dubious Dumas-inspired The Musketeer. Leading a superior cast, Jim Caviezel (Frequency) expresses a delicate balance of obsession and nobility as Dantes, the wrongly accused Frenchman who endures 13 years of prison and torment, then uses a hidden treasure to finance elaborate vengeance on those who wronged him. Memento’s Guy Pearce is equally effective as Dantes’s betraying nemesis, and Richard Harris tops his Harry Potter wizardry with a humorous turn as Dantes’s fellow prisoner and mentor. Filmed on stunning locations in Ireland and Malta, The Count of Monte Cristo easily matches Rob Roy for intelligent swashbuckling entertainment. –Jeff Shannon
The Count of Monte Cristo

  • Share/Bookmark
5 Comments
Feb 1, 2010
5:27 am

My only reason for seeing this film is because Luis Guzman is in it. I find these Napoleon/Shakespeare/pirate films to very very dull, boring and over-long.

Luis plays a much different role here than what we are use to seeing. Doesn’t he look handsome in that red English coat?
Rating: 1 / 5

Feb 1, 2010
5:52 am

THEY SENT ME A BAD DVD, I RETURNED IT HAD TO PAY MY OWN SHIPPING AND THEY CHARGED ME A FEE >>> THEY SUCK !
Rating: 1 / 5

Feb 1, 2010
6:59 am
#3 H. Mirza :

I’ve been itching to buy this movie since I saw it in the theatre. Now I’m going to have to wait until they release a widescreen version because there’s no way I’m paying for pan&scan.

A beautifully crafted film both in visuals and acting, not to mention the masterful story telling. The only letdown is not having widescreen, which is unforgivable and therefore this DVD release gets one star, for what would otherwise be a five star rating.
Rating: 1 / 5

Feb 1, 2010
9:19 am

This is easily one of the five worst movies I’ve ever seen. Forget that, it’s one of the *two* worst movies I’ve ever seen. While Guy Pearce is usually an excellent actor, and Jim Caviezel has the perfect look for Edmund Dantes (at least, post-imprisonment), there is nothing that could have saved such a woefully terrible screenplay. The Dumas novel is one of the best books I’ve ever read, filled with intrigue, action, and mystery, with vibrant characters and brilliant plotting. Granted, adapting such a grand story to the screen would probably take four hours or more, but if one isn’t going to attempt an adaptation of the original story, then one should just make a new movie. That being said, all the interesting, original parts of the book were removed and replaced with a cookie-cutter revenge plot, stereotypical, one-dimensional characters, and bland dialogue that too often inserts modern slang into Napoleonic-era France. This movie is the “Count of Monte Cristo” in name only, and in every other way, a poorly conceived, vapid, dime-a-dozen action flick. Avoid it at all costs.
Rating: 1 / 5

Feb 1, 2010
10:52 am

The movie by itself is really good:photography, actors, acting, drama…blah blah blah.

If you bothered to read the book, then you’ll see why I put the above title. It’s like taking the characters and putting them into an alternate reality. I laughed all throughout the movie. And honestly, doesn’t anyone ever age!?!? It’s like nothing happend. It’s such a cliche revenge flick, it’s absolutely hilarious.

If you want to see the closest version to the book, then buy the French Mini-series (of 1999) that’s available. It has some tiny differences from the book (like the ending) but at least it’s WAY more accurate to the book than this piece of …well, you get what I mean.

If you just want to see a bunch of sword-fighting, some underdeveloped characters, and a bunch of family drama…then this is the movie for your…but then I advise you not to read the book.
Rating: 1 / 5

Sorry, comments are closed.

Previous Post
«
Next Post
»